The controversy surrounding end-times has pitted Muslims against Christians. This has resulted from scriptures in both the Koran and the bible that seem to suggest the possibility of a Muslim antichrist. This is a theological puzzle that is yet to be solved. To get more insight into the topic, it is important to peruse through literature from the two religions in order to make a personal conclusion.
The Koran points out that at some point, a prophet shall return. The circumstances of his return are just before judgment day. The prophet to return is the twelfth imam who is said to have disappeared while he was still young. His disappearance is linked to persecution that target Muslims at the time. This is the scripture that is interpreted to represent the beast for Christians.
In the bible, the antichrist is said to rule before judgment comes upon the earth. The relevant reading for this is the fourth verse of chapter thirteen in the book of Revelations. His promise of peace to Israel for seven years will herald the reign of the beast. Before this period of peace has lapsed, the treaty will be broken and anarchy will reign.
The collapse of the promise of peace to Israel will signal the end of times. The said beast will require recognition as God and rule as a dictator. These signs should be observed closely by Christians because they indicate the end of time. It is the coincidences in the return of this twelfth Islamic imam and the beast just before judgment that lead to the conclusion.
There is a new twist when one reads the book of Daniel in the Old Testament. He talks of rebuilding the old Roman Empire. He says that this will happen towards judgment day. There are traits given to the king of this last kingdom. They are his mastery of intrigues, regarding his being as superior and allowing deceit to thrive. Revelation attributes the same traits to the antichrist.
It is Daniel who exonerates Muslims from this accusation through mention of the Roman Empire. This empire is based in Europe and not the Middle East where most Muslims would be found. There has been continuing hostility between Muslims and Israel which would make a truce of that nature difficult to execute. This means that Muslims would not initiate the seven year treaty that will herald the reign of the beast. They are only likely to destroy Israel.
The antichrist theories are only speculative. The only situation that would herald such a possibility would be the rise of a person of mixed race in the Middle East. Only a half-cast between Muslims and Jews would be welcome on both sides to facilitate a truce. Jews would regard him as their own while Muslims would hail the return of their twelfth Imam.
The mystery of the antichrist being Muslim remains a construction of cross reading the bible and the Koran. Christians are advised to remain cautious and test anyone who comes in the name of the Father. The only way to identify the true leaders is if they confess Christ as the Lord.
The Koran points out that at some point, a prophet shall return. The circumstances of his return are just before judgment day. The prophet to return is the twelfth imam who is said to have disappeared while he was still young. His disappearance is linked to persecution that target Muslims at the time. This is the scripture that is interpreted to represent the beast for Christians.
In the bible, the antichrist is said to rule before judgment comes upon the earth. The relevant reading for this is the fourth verse of chapter thirteen in the book of Revelations. His promise of peace to Israel for seven years will herald the reign of the beast. Before this period of peace has lapsed, the treaty will be broken and anarchy will reign.
The collapse of the promise of peace to Israel will signal the end of times. The said beast will require recognition as God and rule as a dictator. These signs should be observed closely by Christians because they indicate the end of time. It is the coincidences in the return of this twelfth Islamic imam and the beast just before judgment that lead to the conclusion.
There is a new twist when one reads the book of Daniel in the Old Testament. He talks of rebuilding the old Roman Empire. He says that this will happen towards judgment day. There are traits given to the king of this last kingdom. They are his mastery of intrigues, regarding his being as superior and allowing deceit to thrive. Revelation attributes the same traits to the antichrist.
It is Daniel who exonerates Muslims from this accusation through mention of the Roman Empire. This empire is based in Europe and not the Middle East where most Muslims would be found. There has been continuing hostility between Muslims and Israel which would make a truce of that nature difficult to execute. This means that Muslims would not initiate the seven year treaty that will herald the reign of the beast. They are only likely to destroy Israel.
The antichrist theories are only speculative. The only situation that would herald such a possibility would be the rise of a person of mixed race in the Middle East. Only a half-cast between Muslims and Jews would be welcome on both sides to facilitate a truce. Jews would regard him as their own while Muslims would hail the return of their twelfth Imam.
The mystery of the antichrist being Muslim remains a construction of cross reading the bible and the Koran. Christians are advised to remain cautious and test anyone who comes in the name of the Father. The only way to identify the true leaders is if they confess Christ as the Lord.
About the Author:
You can visit www.columbianarestorationchurchofgod.com for more helpful information about What Is The Justification For A Muslim Antichrist.
